Segwi fuq is-Sehem tas-Suq tal-Browser minn Colts.com

Meta ktibt il-post fuq il- Sehem tas-Suq tal-Browser, ħafna mir-reazzjonijiet dwar il-post kien li m'għandix nafda l-istatistika fuq W3Schools.com. Tassew staqsejt dan ir-rispons ... għaliex fid-dinja l-istatistika tvarja b'mod sinifikanti minn websajt għal oħra?

Ukoll, grazzi għall-kontributuri ... Sibt li verament jimpurtax! Ħallejt email lill-ħabib tajjeb Pat Coyle u staqsejt jekk hux lest li jaqsam xi statistika mingħand Colts.com. Il-ħsieb tiegħi kien li l-fan sportiv avid probabbilment huwa pjuttost differenti minn xi ħadd li jżur sit dwar it-Teknoloġiji tal-Web u jkun grupp ta 'paragun tajjeb biex tkejjel miegħu. U kien! L-istatistiċi li ġejjin huma bbażati fuq l-aħħar 870,000 viżitatur għal Colts.com:

Sehem tas-Suq tal-Viżitatur Colts.com:

Colts.com Browser Stats - Dettaljati

Sehem tas-Suq tal-Viżitatur tal-Viżitatur Colts.com - Ħarsa ġenerali:

Statistika tal-Browser Colts.com

Fir-rigward tal-JavaScript, għadu juri penetrazzjoni kbira:

Statistika JavaScript Colts.com

Min kien jaf ?! Minn issa 'l quddiem nagħti ħafna iktar attenzjoni lill-istatistika tal-ishma tal-brawżers indipendenti meta narahom minflok ma nagħmel suppożizzjonijiet dwar is-sehem tas-suq ġenerali. Fuq nota tal-ġenb, hawn huma l-istats għall-blog tiegħi għall-aħħar xahar. Qatt ma tajt ħarsa lejhom qabel, imma tara differenza mhux ħażin!

Browser Stats għall-Viżitaturi tiegħi:

L-Istatistiċi tal-Browser Tiegħi

6 Kummenti

  1. 1

    I have heard this too, and while it does make some sense, one could say that every site will generate a different browser spread due to the unique audiences. I’d like to think that if you took all of the stats to the most popular websites and combined them, you’d get what they got. (I haven’t checked on their data source myself).

    I know a lot of bloggers are tuned into Firefox, but the Colts get the general masses.

    Great data set, thanks for sharing. Nice graphs, too 🙂

  2. 2
  3. 4

    Ħe Doug,

    I’m glad you revisited this with different stats to W3Schools, I was about to write a scathing comment on that post!

    The point that has really been uncovered here is that the only stats that matter are the ones for the site you are considering at the time. If for example neither your site nor the Colts site worked in IE, the Colts would have far more problems than you. Each site has to work with it’s audience and the browsers they use.

    As an overall measure of browser share at the moment, just to see how Mozilla are doing, I’d like to see Google’s browser stats!

  4. 5

    Computer geeks definately use Firefox more than the average shmoe. I use both. I only use IE now cuz I’m accustomed to it, but I am slowly moving more towards Firefox. Especially lately after getting hit by malware twice in one month while using IE.

  5. 6

    Thanks for this post! All i’ve seen to date are stats from technology heavy sites, thus the users are probably more likely to have a high resolution and another browser besides IE. I’d like to see what the avg screen resolution on colts.com is… I really want to get away from desiging for 800x and use 1024x as my baseline

What do you think?

Dan is-sit juża Akismet biex inaqqas l-ispam. Tgħallem kif il-kumment tiegħek huwa pproċessat.